WikiCED manual: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
   This is just a draft placeholder while the overall document is developed.
   This is just a draft placeholder while the overall document is developed.
   Please do not edit, send comments to [[User:DavidM| DavidM]] for now.
   Please do not edit, send comments to [[User:DavidM| DavidM]] for now.


'''Change from within:'''
'''Change from within:'''
Line 39: Line 38:


People have very good reasons to be hesitant about change. Technological change – seeing if its tested
People have very good reasons to be hesitant about change. Technological change – seeing if its tested
 
the background reasons for technology to be developed and used.


{{#ask: [[Category:Play Person]]
{{#ask: [[Category:Play Person]]
Line 82: Line 81:


# describe key goal (including baselines and measurements), critical budget and timing issues
# describe key goal (including baselines and measurements), critical budget and timing issues
#define and refine goal(s)  
# define and refine goal(s)  
# research solutions and select working set
# research solutions and select working set
# refine goals based on working set  
# refine goals based on working set  
Line 88: Line 87:
# measure effectiveness  
# measure effectiveness  
# summarize effects  
# summarize effects  
 
# iterate
avoid custom software vs accessibility
avoid custom software vs accessibility
what do the non profit tech workers want? - problems
what do the non profit tech workers want? - problems
==Access==
==Access==


Line 98: Line 96:
=Technology as a solution=
=Technology as a solution=


We think of the technology we use today as new, but in reality most of it has been around, in different forms, for a long time. Hypertext, for example – a way to create links between documents – were visualized in a microfiche based system in the 1940s. The entire Internet as a mass novelty, in the 1990s, resulted in a crash shortly thereafter as expectations were deflated.
We think of the technology we use today as new, but in reality most of it has been around, in different forms, for a long time. [[wp:Hypertext]], for example – a way to create links between documents – was visualized in a microfiche based system in the 1940s (the [[wp:Memex]]). There are large cycles of introduction, reaction, revision. The entire Internet as a mass novelty, in the 1990s, resulted in the [[wp:Dot-com bubble Dot-com bubble]] shortly thereafter, as overexcited expectations were deflated.


But the Internet has to be considered one of the greatest, and most unexpected innovations of our lifetime. No company would have created a network where anyone can publish and access information with equal ease and virtually no cost, with anyone, around the world. It's the product of generations of scientists and strategists, now available for anyone to use, at the price of stepping into a limelight, encrypted or not. Twitter, the current craze, merely represents the latest version of the [[wp:Echo chamber]], is a metaphorical space where “information, ideas or beliefs are amplified or reinforced by transmission ” - but this time, with more identity.
The Internet does have to be considered one of the greatest, and most unexpected innovations of our lifetime. No company would have created a network where anyone can publish and access information with equal ease and virtually no cost, for nearly anyone, around the world (nor could they, due to the cooperation involved). Companies were left scrambling to react to this disruptive development.
 
The internet is the product of generations of scientists, strategists, and implementers, now available for anyone to use, at the price of stepping into a limelight, encrypted or not. Twitter, the current craze, merely represents the latest version of the [[wp:Echo chamber]], a metaphorical space where “information, ideas or beliefs are amplified or reinforced by transmission ” - but this time, with more identity.
 
 
The internet went through several phases of  “killer applications,” as the entire world happened across  its capabilities. Majorly are the ease and (no) cost sending of email and the richness of the World Wide Web, which was originally envisioned as an intimately linked, eminently re-usable “read-write” research web, where one web site's information can be linked with another, and information shared easily. Unfortunately, commercial and individual enthusiasm (and the unreadiness of the background technology) has resulted in many messes – email can be unusable due to “spam,” and most web sites today could be easier to use as a paper brochure, and they certainly don't encourage information re-use.
 
This is another reason it is important to highlight the background reasons for technology to be developed and used.


Wikis promote one of the original ideas of the Web, easy participation, and newer developments promote easier exchange of information – for example, using another organization's data in your Web site using systems such as Freebase and Semantic Mediawiki.
Wikis promote one of the original ideas of the Web, easy participation, and newer developments promote easier exchange of information – for example, using another organization's data in your Web site using systems such as Freebase and Semantic Mediawiki.
Line 106: Line 111:
go past using tech as typewriter
go past using tech as typewriter


curb cut principle
curb cut
principle
don't expect more than what is offered
don't expect more than what is offered


Line 112: Line 118:


technology as a threat
technology as a threat


=Connecting and getting advice=
=Connecting and getting advice=
1,459

edits